The Effect of Images in Writing Spoof Texts on Students’ Ability of Grade XI at SMA Negeri 1 Pematangsiantar

Authors

  • Yanti Kristina Sinaga Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar
  • David Togi Hutahaean

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i2.18440

Keywords:

Images, Writing, Spoof Text

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of visual media, specifically images, on Grade X students’ ability to write spoof texts at SMA Negeri 1 Pematangsiantar. Using a quasiexperimental design with a pretest-posttest nonequivalent group format, 62 students were divided into an experimental group receiving image-based instruction and a control group taught without visual aids. The experimental group demonstrated significant improvement, with mean scores increasing from 51.26 in the pretest to 84.74 in the posttest, compared to the control group’s modest increase from 50.39 to 66.65. The t-test analysis confirmed the results were statistically significant (t-value = 6.06, p < 0.05). Visual media enhanced students’ understanding of spoof text structures, including orientation, events, and twists. It also fostered creativity and narrative cohesion, enabling students to construct engaging and coherent stories. In contrast, traditional instruction showed limited effectiveness in improving these skills. The findings highlight the benefits of integrating visual aids into English instruction, particularly for creative writing tasks. Images serve as effective scaffolding tools, helping students organize ideas and improve writing quality. This study underscores the potential of visual media to enhance students’ creative abilities in narrative genres, emphasizing its importance in educational practices.

References

A, D., & Kim, S. (2022). Enhancing Writing Skills through Digital Visual Media in High School Education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 521-530.

Abington-Pitre, A. (2020). The role of visual communication in modern education. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 178-195.

Amal, S., Rahman, F., & Hassan, N. (2023). The Impact of Visual Aids on Writing Skills in EFL Classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 15(1), 521-539.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

Asif, M., & Yang, S. (2021). Understanding text types: A comprehensive guide for language learners. Applied Linguistics Review, 12(1), 10-28.

Badaru, K., Ahmed, L., & Omar, S. (2022). The importance of academic writing in higher education. Journal of Academic Writing, 12(3), 301-315.

Brown, H. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). London: Pearson.

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Evha, N., & Sa’adiyah. (2019). “The Effect of Using Sequenced Pictures on Students’ Ability to Write Narrative.”. IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 8(2), 8-14.

Farida, D., Isrina, H. D., & & Apsari, Y. (2019). The implementation of flash cards to improve students’ vocabulary mastery. Project (professional journal of English education), 2(3), 352-357.

Fraenkel, J., & Wallen, N. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gomez, A., & Tran, H. (2022). Developing critical thinking through writing: A comprehensive approach in EFL contexts. Journal of Linguistics Application, 13(2), 112-129.

Hardiyanti, R. L., & & Arini, R. (2023). The implementation of flashcards to teach spoken functional text to eighth graders. JOEL (Journal of Educational and Language Research), 3(1).

Harianti, R. (2021). Understanding spoof texts: A genre analysis for EFL learners. TESOL Journal, 12(3), 11-21.

Harianti, S. (2021). Error analysis on students' writing spoof text at Grade XI SMA N Batahan.

Johnson, A. (2022). Academic writing: Bridging the gap between research and communication. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 112-135.

Johnson, L., & Moore, D. (2021). Teaching language skills in EFL classrooms: Integrating writing for cognitive growth. Language and Learning Instruction Journal, 45(3), 189-205.

Julianti, W. (2020). Analyzing the students' grammatical error in spoof text of the twelfth grade at the first semester of SMAN 1 Belalau Lampung Barat in academic year of 2020/2021.

Orianda, P., & R.N, R. (2013). Teaching Writing a Spoof Text by Using Series of Pictures. Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 11-22.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (1997). Introduction to academic writing. London: Longman.

Rosdiana. (2011). The Effect of Picture Story Toward Students' Ability in Writing Spoof Text. . A Thesis. IAIN.

Simanjuntak, T. D. (2020). The students' ability in writing spoof text at Grade XI SMK Negeri 1 Sibolga.

Smith, J. (2021). The art of effective writing: From basics to mastery. Chicago: Penguin House.

Tampubolon, S. (2023). The Effect of Self Assessment Strategy on Students’ Writing Recount Text at Eight Grade of SMP Swasta Advent 5 Medan. Jorunal of Language Education (JoLE), 1(1), 81-88.

Yanwar, A. P. (2020). An analysis of students' writing skill in hartatory text at the first semester of Public Administration Study Program of the Faculty of Social and Political Science. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 7(1), 66-76.

Yuni, F. (2021). An analysis on students' problem in writing spoof text at the eleventh grade SMK N 4 Bandar Lampung.

Yusuf, M., & Rosvita, A. (2024). The Use of Pictures as Media for Teaching Writing in EFL Classrooms. RELC Journal, 2(1), 68-82.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-14

How to Cite

Sinaga, Y. K., & Hutahaean, D. T. (2025). The Effect of Images in Writing Spoof Texts on Students’ Ability of Grade XI at SMA Negeri 1 Pematangsiantar. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(2), 1527–1541. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i2.18440

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)