Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Membaca Pada Siswa Kelas V Di SDN Inpres Simpasai Kecamatan Lambu Kabupaten Bima

Ariani Ariani; Muhammad Salahuddin; A. Haris; Rizcky Juliawan

doi:10.31004/innovative.v5i1.17496

Authors

Ariani Ariani STKIP Harapan Bima
Muhammad Salahuddin STKIP Harapan Bima
A. Haris STKIP Harapan Bima
Rizcky Juliawan STKIP Harapan Bima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i1.17496

Abstract

Reading literacy skills at SDN Inpres Simpasai, Lambu District, Bima Regency are still low due to the lack of motivation from parents and from several other factors. The purpose of this study is to study and describe students' reading literacy skills as measured through reading literacy indicators in grade V students at SDN Inpres Simpasai. This type of research is a qualitative research using a descriptive method. This research data is in the form of words, sentences, and paragraphs. The data was sourced from teachers and students of grade V at SDN Inpres Simpasai, the cematan lambu of Bima Regency. The data collection techniques in this study include observation, interview, and documentation techniques. The data analysis technique uses Miles and Huberman's descriptive and interactive analysis techniques. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that students' reading literacy skills are good. Reading skills can be categorized into four categories, (1) the category of poor reading can be 1 student with a percentage of 2.94%, (2) quite good there are 3 students with a percentage of 9.82%, (3) good there are 12 students with a percentage of 36.29%, and (4) very good there are 18 students with a percentage of 53.94%. Reading comprehension ability includes indicators (1) not understanding the text read, there are 6 students with a percentage of 17.64%, (2) very low reading ability, there is 1 student with a percentage of 2.94%, (3) difficulty concentrating in reading letters or words, there are 5 students with a percentage of 14.70%, (4) lack of understanding punctuation, there are 6 students with a percentage of 17.64%, (5) unable to explain the text read, there were 8 students with a percentage of 23.52%, (6) difficulty remembering the text read,there were 8 students with a percentage of 23.52%.

References

Ahmadi, F., & Ibda, H. (2022). Media Literasi Sekolah (Teori Dan Praktik). Semarang: CV Pilarnusantar.

Almadiliana., Saputra, H. H., & Setiawan, H. (2021). Hubungan antara Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman dengan Kemampuan Memahami Soal Cerita Matematika Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar. 1 (2): 57-65

Amalia, M., Riyadi, A. R., & Mulyasari, E. (2019). Penerapan Model CIRC untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. 4 (1): 15-28

Aswita, D., Saputra, S., Yoestara, M. (2022). Pendidikan literasi memenuhi abad 21. Yogyakarta: penerbit K-Media.

Barita, R. S., Wulan, N. S., & Wahyudin, D. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2336-2344.

Bastin, N. (2022). Keterampilan Literasi Membaca dan Menulis. Sidoarjo: Nahason Bating Publishing.

Dalman. (2017). Keteranpilan Membaca. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Diliana, A., Saputra, H. H., & Setiawan, H. (2021). Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman dengan Kemampuan Memahami Soal Cerita Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Pendagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 57-65.

Aprilia, D. D., & Zulfadli, H. (2023). “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Membaca Siswa Kelas IV di MI NW Lendang Batu Tahun Ajaran 2023/2024.” Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan 2(3): 96–105. doi:10.56444/soshumdik.v2i3.1042.

Herlina, H. O. (2016). “Tiga Perubahan Kecil dalam Literasi Sekolah.” Membumikan Gerakan Literasi di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Ladang Kata.

Harahap, D, G., Fauziah, N, Eni Sumanti Nst, dan Salman Alparis Sormin. (2022). “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Basicedu 6(2): 2089–98. doi:10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2400.

Irianto, P. O., & Febrianti, L. Y. (2017). Pentingnya penguasaan literasi bagi generasi muda dalam menghadapi MEA. In Proceedings Education and Language International Conference (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). (online) Arti kata Dekonstruksi https://kbbi.web.id/dekonstruksi. diakses pada Kamis, 18 Agustus 2022.

Poerwadarminta. (2017). Manajemen Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan. Gava Media. Yogyakarta.

Rahmania, S., Miarsyah, M., & Sartono, N. (2015). Perbedaan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa dengan gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 27-34.

Riyanti, A. (2021). Keterampilan Membaca. Yogyakarta: Penerbit K-Media

Rochajati, S. (2020). Strategi Peningkatan Minat Baca Untuk SD. Semarang: CV Pilar Nusantara.

Salam. S., et al. (2016) Analisis Kesalahan Penggunaan Tanda Baca Tanya dan Tanda Baca Titik pada Teks Dialog Siswa. Jurnal Peda didaktika Vol 3 (26).168 – 17

Suyono, S., Harsiati, T., & Wulandari, I. S. (2017). Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah pada Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan, 26(2), 116-123.